Flash, spin and the future

This weekend I accidentally and very vigorously washed and tumble-dried my 2GB USB stick. The stick is carries most of the digital photo archive for fifthestate, as well as a couple of manuscripts containing my edits, and some open source software, essential for the smooth running of this blog. Of course, it’s absolutely fine, and everything still works perfectly. A normal occurence now, but cast your mind back 3 years and consider the likely effects of a gallon of water and a dose of persil would have on a hard drive.

Whilst I waited for half of fifthestate’s work in progress to finish soapily clanking around behind the glass window of the washing machine, here’s what was spinning though my mind:

Wikipedia on flash memory (as opposed to a conventional hard drive with moving parts):

flash memory is non-volatile, which means that it does not need power to maintain … Another allure of flash memory is that when packaged in a ‘memory card’, it is nearly indestructible by ordinary physical means, being able to withstand intense pressure and boiling water.

One of the most convincing arguments I’ve held in my armoury for the superiority of the physical book is that you can do almost anything to it (drop it, write in it, tear pages out, bang nails into the wall with it) and it survives in a useable form. This is more than you can say for most pieces of prototype hardware designed for e-books, especially if my 1998 laptop is anything to go by.

Well, you’ll still have a long way to convince me that specialised (dedicated) hardware for ebooks is a winner. But times are changing, as anyone with an iPod nano (also uses flash memory, unlike the full size iPod which has a hard drive) will tell you. Electronic media hardware is getting about as robust as a baby elephant. FutureoftheBook have been efficiently tracking this, seemingly since before the days when email replaced letters.

Storage space and volatility no longer such an issue, and battery life improving, we can concentrate on more qualitative barriers to bringing books to a fresh audience, such as conflicting form-factor requirements (Large amounts of text require large screens to be read comfortably, right? While market pressure for portable devices is for them to be smaller…)

So with the stretch of flash improving on an almost daily basis, even the dawn of an age where it is no longer necessary to store/house anything locally, and the widescreen iPod just around the corner, the answer is probably sitting within 4 feet of us. Given the widespread adoption of the video-MP3 player it is slightly baffling why we publishers don’t experiment with the iPod (and Microsoft’s forthcoming rival player Zune) more thoroughly. Who knows, maybe Apple and Microsoft would be even quicker off the mark in developing on a competive platform for books if sample content was already there to meet them?

Here’s 4 suggestions/thoughts from the laundrette. By no means an expert opinion, but more a snapshot of the mind of an editor who’s a very recent but willing recruit to the 21st Century:

  • Use iTunes as a means of distributing extracts from books. An exclusive extract PDF from The Long Tail is offered by Random House in such a way for free, but has anyone explored distributing full text for payment?
  • If copyright holders (usually the author) are interested in experimenting with this, perhaps under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Licence, there are some pretty workable hacks for converting text files into iPod books Might be fun to experiment with some in-the-field or nature books or short classics. (Slight deviation here, but I’ve got the whole of wikipedia on my iPod for 2GB, and, though it is pretty clunky in terms of usability, it’s nice to carry so much information around for pub arguments).
  • Create visual content? Of course nobody is saying Hammersmith or the Strand are/should be Hollywood, but given new platforms for audiobooks, would simple graphics and videoclips of author events and lectures add value and appeal? or simply reproduction of plate sections and graphics at correctly-timed moments? An Inconvenient Truth is the third highest grossing documentary in the US to date and it’s based on a slide show. Wouldn’t be fantastic if publishing industry was there to greet the Zune and the next generation iPod with content to rival EMI?
  • Spend extra time considering the format of digital text we’re warehousing? Most publishers’ digitisation programmes centre round storage of PDFs and jpegs. Fine for current initiatives such as Google books and Amazon search inside, but not so good beyond it. The iPod hack I mentioned above uses .txt files. And with a wealth of hardware about to be launched amongst a cacophony of questions regarding the multitude of file types supported and what DRM is available to protect them, maybe book publishers next move will be to warehouse a more ‘unlockable’ format as well.
  • Bookmark and Share

    Kate Hyde

    Mon, 30 Oct 2006, 6:43 PM

    2 Comments

    This entry was tagged with the following keywords

    , , , , , ,

    Comments

    I think there are two reasons people don’t read more content on portable electronic devices, and neither are anything to do with affection for the printed page.

    The first is that people can’t be bothered to work it out or to pay. The horrible success of the Blackberry shows that people will read pages and pages of badly rendered ASCII if you force it into their coat pockets. If they are prepared to do that, they ought to be reading offline internet channels on AvantGo or feeds on RSS, but of course non-geeks don’t know about that stuff.

    The iPod offered the option to store your entire music collection in a coat pocket, but this impressive-sounding feature wasn’t truly what drove the mass market sales, for most people it came about almost by accident as they bought the small pretty Walkman and then had to work out how to put music on it.

    So I agree, iTunes, being something everyone already has and already understands, may well be the way to deliver text content to a wide audience who aren’t interested in finding out how to do it.

    The other thing is the devices themselves. It’s true that they don’t currently make reading a pleasant experience, but I don’t think that’s truly about the size of the handheld. If the screen could be made bright enough, and high res enough, to rival print, people would be happy reading on a scrolling device the size of an iPod. And they’d be even happier if flexible ‘electronic paper’ becomes a low-cost manufacturable reality. The screens are the secret.

    I for one would love to say goodbye to the book.

    But I’m not sure it’s really in publishers’ interests to support this change anyway. Whatever business models, restrictions and add ons are developed, we are ultimately talking about words, the simplest and most easily-shared content of all. Blockbusters like The Da Vinci Code are already illegally downloadable in minutes for free, and that’s at a time when no one really reads electronically. Imagine the amount that would be available if it caught on.

    It’s only going to get worse.

    Post your comment