5th Estate · Surviving the Edit

Surviving the Edit

I was at a talk the other night given by a writer who’s currently flying high in the bestseller charts, and he had a frightening story to tell.

Several years ago he was in London discussing the novel he’d just finished over lunch with his editor, getting feedback and agreeing what work still needed to be done. The writer had the feeling his editor wasn’t entirely enthused with this particular novel but felt nothing had been raised that couldn’t be put right.

As an aside, however, his editor asked what he was working on at the moment, a conversation that resulted in the writer handing over a computer disk containing the first hundred pages of an as yet unfinished novel…

Two days later, the writer gets a phone call from his editor: scrap the novel we were discussing. I want to publish this one instead. And it needs to be done in five weeks. So that’s what the writer did.

Another writer, Chandler McGrew, explained how his elation at getting a six figure contract for his debut novel soured somewhat when his new editor said, in a throwaway manner, Could you add a second killer?

Welcome to the world of the edit: if you think the hard work’s done when you finally get offered your contract, it’s time to start thinking again.

Between your novel selling and being signed off to go to print, there are three stages it has to go through — an edit where you liase with your editor to get the writing, plot, characterisation and themes as highly polished as possible, an edit where a copy-editor goes through your manuscript for continuity, grammar, plus any of the above they feel still needs to be addressed, and, finally, page-proof sign-off — your last chance to spot any mistakes.

For me, with Broken selling in the UK, the US and Canada, I had three editors giving me feedback during the first of these stages, so ended up with a page of notes from Canada, a marked up manuscript plus four or five pages of notes from the UK, and another marked up manuscript (plus another four or fives pages of notes) from the US.

Once all this feedback was in, I redrafted until I felt I’d addressed everything I wanted to address, then e-mailed the revised manuscript back to my editors. We then had two or three months where we continued to question everything in the novel in an attempt to get it as good as it could possibly be.

The points raised at this stage typically included typos, queries on what was motivating characters to do certain things, questions on localisms in the novel (Housing Association properties alongside private residencies, for instance, are quite common where the novel is set, but not so elsewhere), and requests for confirmation that I’d researched police procedures and other events in the text.

Once this stage was complete, things went quiet for a few weeks while the copy-editor got to work. Then there were more notes and another marked up manuscript to go through before, finally, we reached the page proof stage, and a last chance to spot any mistakes.

All in all, from the editors first seeing the manuscript to giving final sign off took about six months. I’m not sure how typical this is, but I’ve read somewhere that eight months is the standard period of time set aside.
If you’re ever lucky enough to go through this process, I’d say have an open mind to any suggestions your editors make. I’ve heard some writers talk about editors as if they’re the enemy, and I’ve heard plenty of unpublished writers swear they’ll never make changes to their manuscripts, but I think a writer is always going to be too close to a manuscript to have a completely objective view.

I also think, once you’ve written your novel, the more feedback you can get, the better — it’s amazing how one small query can lead you off in a completely different direction, and by the time the edit was finished, Broken had grown in length by eight thousand words, the fates of two major characters had changed, and the strength of the novel — the ending in particular — had gone up several notches. Although it was stressful to have my writing put under such scrutiny by three people who were total strangers to me at the start of the process, it was also extremely rewarding, and an experience I’ll never forget.

Funnily enough, the most stressful part wasn’t the redrafting, it was the page proofs. No matter how often I looked through the manuscript, I never felt I’d checked it enough. Even now, with the novel being physically printed at a factory somewhere in Devon, I’m convinced it’s riddled with mistakes. I’ve even got a photocopy of the page-proofs on my desk. Several times a day, I go to a random page and look for the typos I’ve missed. A few times, over the past few weeks, I’ve even woke up from dreams where I’ve found them, and have had to get up and come in here to check it’s not true.

Sad? Natural? I’ve no idea, but if any other writers out there have been through this, it would be nice to know I’m not insane or completely alone…

Daniel Clay

Tue, 26 Feb 2008, 4:10 PM

4 Comments

Comments

Well your not alone Daniel, I know of other bestselling authors who say the same thing.

Its a tricky one, I think you have to work with your agent, in a way there sort of your boss, so you’ve got to. But the editing process isn’t half a subjective one and some changes undoubtedly wouldn’t need to be made, but if it wasn’t for opening up another area of the market, or increasing the books product value.

I’ve self published and I’m still submitting all the time, until someone takes on either my series of books, or my new one. But even with self publishing finding and getting a GOOD copy editor and a GOOD proofreader (I believe its sometimes best to do those steps separately) is really crucial.

So really I think if you’ve got a contract or you are going to do it yourself like me, you’ve got to polish it until its gleaming, in order that there would be no mistakes at all.

I’d say the last bit is normal, but it depends how long you’ve been writing. Maybe it never leaves some of us!

Hi Daniel

I haven’t commented in awhile as ‘my day job’ demands heated up. This essay gives me both the jitters and hope. I have been plowing away trying to incorporate your suggestions into INCW and making some headway – so thank you again. At the same time I wonder if I shouldn’t just put it into a drawer for 15 or 20 years and get on with writing something else. I’ll probably do some variant of both.

Much Good Luck with the launch of your novel. I’m looking forward to reading it.
Martha

Hi Martha,

Great to hear from you again. Don’t get the jitters and don’t stick your novel in a drawer for 15 or 20 years! Keep going and enjoy yourself as much as you can. It’ll be great to hear what you think of Broken if you do get hold of a copy.

Best wishes,

Daniel.

Yes. Another author who KNOWS, as Stephen King says. I learned long ago that for me the editing process, both self-editing and professional, is one of the most rewarding parts of the writing. A writer grows immensely through the process. Dean Koontz claims to have only written one book out of nearly 100 published in which his editor did not want to change one word. He was immensely happy, not because he didn’t have to do any further work, but because he had reached a pinnacle in his craft at which he had written something so well.

Post your comment