
An interesting morning down here at the Oxford Literary Festival. Dreaming Spires sit gloomily beneath leaden skies, it’s grey and peaceful. The streets bustle in an orderly fashion, birds sing. Right now the only thing upsetting me is a rogue car alarm, set off at the smallest provocation. But that didn’t stop some half-decent history…
The good news is that the OLF appears to be a well-organised, fun and entirely proper affair. Old women sit politely through talks while old men feel compelled to complain prior-to and after each session, usually something about having to queue for seats. As with the Cheltenham the average age for the morning sessions is over 60. You can’t help but think that if Literary festivals are to expand then the audiences they attract must be more diverse. However this only seems to happen in the evenings currently.
The festival marquee sits on the bank of the Christ Church Meadow, the college sweeping up behind the temporary auditorium. Further back lurk the best festival toilets I’ve ever seen. Wood panelling, clean floors and little paintings of coffee cups stolen from the nearest Café Rouge adorn the walls. This is upmarket. The attendants are helpful and friendly, the rooms well sign-posted.
All of which helps you to marvel at the level of organisation exhibited by the Austrians during the Congress of Vienna, the subject of Harper Press author Adam Zamoyski’s latest book Rites of Peace and also his lecture this morning in Christ Church College’s Upper Library.
In the autumn of 1814 the various of powers of Europe decided to come together and dissect Europe as Napoleon’s empire began to finally crumble. Zamoyski’s traditional knowledge of the event was that this was a dignified affair with heads of state and diplomats engaged in some of the most intellectual political manoeuvring of the age. The truth, as Zamoyski found, was very different.
The problems arose when all the main parties fell-out with one another. What was supposed to take four to six weeks in fact took around nine months. So both diplomatic fatigue and boredom set in, which is when the naughtiness began.
The Congress of Vienna was not simply a group of men in a locked, smoky room, thrashing out Europe between them, it was a full-on festival in its own right. Each head of state had brought family and friends, who all needed entertaining, transporting and feeding. Therefore more staff were brought into Austria, more merchants, more suppliers of booze, song and, yes, sex. In short Vienna was headed for a nine month party, causing an enormous hangover headache for Europe.
We know much of the debauchery thanks to Zamoyski’s fantastic research into documents collected by Mitternich, the Austrian Chancellor who at the time was operating the world’s largest secret police force. Spies from every level of the event were drafted in to report on the activities of anyone doing anything. Low-level court members were under surveillance or if Tsar Alexander I of Russia spent too long out hunting, Mitternich knew about it.
Not that Mitternich made best use of the information, rather the culture of gossip and intrigue he had arguably created instead rebounded back on himself. While attempting to organise the drawing up of the new Europe, the Chancellor found himself suffering from the worst teenage sort of puppy love for Wilhelmina, Princess of Sagan. A fact that was used against him by Alexander during negotiations.
Thankfully our own Prince Regent wasn’t allowed anywhere near Europe remaining on the mainland UK, though I’m sure he would have enjoyed the partying. Rather the British contingent was lead by the good-natured but not politically savvy Castlereagh and latterly by the Duke of Wellington himself.
Zamoyski’s skill in crafting this book and indeed his lecture was to point out that each history of this event seems to be written in favour of the country from which the account was presented. Zamoyski has managed to brilliantly shape these numerous reports in to an exploration of what made these men tick and why Europe is the way it is.
Why Britain is the way it is was sort-of the subject of the first afternoon session conducted by Medieval expert and sometime tv presenter Marc Morris on the life and times of Edward I — a ‘great and terrible king’. Being a fan of Medieval history myself I’d been waiting for Morris’s book for a while and it does not disappoint. Neither does the man himself, who delivered a fast and often funny talk on the subject of Edward’s life while trying to correct a few myths about him along the way.
As one audience member asked, why do we know so much about Henry VIII or Elizabeth I and so little about Edward I? Well he is, in short, problematic. On the one hand he travels further than any English monarch until Edward the VII. When he talks about going to Crusade he actually goes. He has peace with Scotland for most his reign, there is peace with France for most of his reign. He builds amazing castles and flushes out corruption from the judiciary. He loves his wife and has 15 children with her.
So far so impressive, however the problems begin when you dig deeper. There was also war with Scotland and France. Welsh independence was crushed and Wales occupied via those amazing castles. His crusade attempts and wars cost the English people heavily in taxation. He was a raging anti-semite (though, like much of England’s population) and eventually has the Jews expelled from the country. One historian has gone as far as to compare him to Hitler.
Morris has done a brilliant job of trying to reconcile Edward’s great and terrible moments and asks the questions, in order to be great, does one have to be terrible as well? After all Henry III (Edward’s father) was pretty poor by comparison and caused much bloodshed with little end result. Edward at least got things done. What results is the image of King who held the ideals of chivalry most highly, but knew the power in deceit in playing a political game. And, of course, when push came to shove, the power of an almighty catapult too.