This week’s post from The Friday Project comes from John Higgs, author of I Have America Surrounded: The Life of Timothy Leary. Higgs is a BAFTA-nominated television writer and producer, and has written for publications including the Guardian, Mojo and the Independent.

I am about to admit a shameful secret. I have only confessed this once before, to a publisher who was so appalled that I feared she might slap me rudely across the face. When I pick out an interesting looking book in a bookshop I check how many pages it has. If it is four or five hundred, I usually put it back. I have ploughed through so many overly-padded books in the past that I became wary of a hefty page count. This has reached the point where, judging a book to be guilty until proven innocent, I now avoid long books.
It’s a question of time, rather than of attention span. The amount of books available online or in the big chains has grown exponentially, and I am surely not the only one who also has a further pile of unread books at home. Nothing would please me more than being able to fully explore this book mountain, but realistically I can only scrape away at the edges. Two or three good shorter books, in this context, satisfies my curiosity more than one long one.
Then there are the other things which compete for my attention. DVD box sets, video games, podcasts and 3D IMAX have all emerged in the last decade or two – to say nothing of the never-ending Internet, where all recorded music is only a click away and everyone that I have ever met is eager to keep me up to date with their adventures. When you add in work, family, physical activities and the incessant noise of 21st Century life, I fear that it is only my complete lack of interest in sport that allows me to read at all.
In the modern world, a lengthy book has to be able to justify itself. Many can, of course, but it is more common for a book to be long because it is expected to be long, rather than because it needs to be. There is the assumption that length equates to intellectual merit and a weighty title is deeper and more profound than a lightweight book. This is nonsense, and it is easy to produce a list of shorter books to make this point — The Old Man and the Sea, Animal Farm, Candide and the Tao Te Ching are the first that spring to mind. It is not the amount of words that is important, but what the author has done with them. Academic and reference titles aside, an author who takes more than 100,000 words to say what it is that they have to say is just plain rude.
Of course, there are reasons why books are the lengths that they are. Marketing departments study the public’s expectations of how books in various genres should appear. Complicated costing processes can lead to publishers stipulating the length of still-unwritten books in the authors’ contract. But if the shift to ebooks proves to be as significant as many predict, then this reasoning will be eroded. A tight, well-written 50,000 word ebook will be no less commercial than an overly-padded 200,000 word blether.
In music, the length of an album has always been dictated by current technology, be that vinyl, compact disc or single MP3s. I suspect that a typical book length will also change, now that more of us are using eReaders. If this is the case, then authors will no longer feel obliged to reach for word counts beyond what their subject requires. A normal book length will be however few words it takes to satisfy the urge to write the book in the first place.
And if an editor then trims a further 20%, just to be on the safe side, then that will be even better.